Thorny trade-offs for Starmer will be waiting for his successor toopublished at 12:00 BST
Henry Zeffman
Chief political correspondent
We knew before Starmer spoke what the reaction to his speech would be from most rival political parties and leading defence figures, as well as some within the Labour fold: that this is not enough funding given the scale of the threat the UK faces.
Starmer nodded to the possibility that his successor may well have to come back before long with more defence spending when speaking about how this was a platform to be built on.
Throughout there was an implicit acknowledgement of the unusual reality that he is the prime minister unveiling this significant amount of defence spending but will not be the one to deliver it.
The PM also talked about the trade-offs of defence spending and how he has cut capital spending from other departments to spend money on defence. But he said that he did not want to cut spending on day-to-day public services, ie schools and hospitals.
This was an argument made by some government sources off the record in the aftermath of John Healey’s resignation, now made explicit.
Those are the thorny trade-offs that are going to be in Andy Burnham's in-tray before long.





